| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1482338488.11006.70.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:41:28 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Jason@...c4.com,
linux@...encehorizons.net
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net, David.Laight@...lab.com,
djb@...yp.to, ebiggers3@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luto@...capital.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, tom@...bertland.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu,
vegard.nossum@...il.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: HalfSipHash Acceptable Usage
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 10:55 -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
> Actually, DJB just made a very relevant suggestion.
>
> As I've mentioned, the 32-bit performance problems are an x86-
> specific
> problem. ARM does very well, and other processors aren't bad at all.
>
> SipHash fits very nicely (and runs very fast) in the MMX registers.
>
> They're 64 bits, and there are 8 of them, so the integer registers
> can
> be reserved for pointers and loop counters and all that. And there's
> reference code available.
>
> How much does kernel_fpu_begin()/kernel_fpu_end() cost?
Those can be very expensive. Almost certainly not
worth it for small amounts of data.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists