[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <585C6003.9050806@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:21:39 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, shahark@...lanox.com,
gerlitz.or@...il.com, roid@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net, sched: fix soft lockup in tc_classify
On 12/22/2016 06:50 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16-12-22 08:53 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:07:48 +0100
>>
>>> Ok, you mean for net. In that case I prefer the smaller sized fix to
>>> be honest. It also covers everything from the point where we fetch
>>> the chain via cops->tcf_chain() to the end of the function, which is
>>> where most of the complexity resides, and only the two mentioned
>>> commits do the relock, so as a fix I think it's fine as-is. As
>>> mentioned, if there's need to refactor tc_ctl_tfilter() net-next
>>> would be better, imho.
>>
>> Please, can you two work towards an agreement as to what fix should
>> go in at this time?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Thanks for fixing this!
>
> I have a slight preference to push this patch into net as its been
> tested already by Shahar and is not particularly invasive. Then for
> net-next do a larger cleanup to get rid of some of the complexity per
> Cong's suggestion.
My preference as well, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists