netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2/net-next 0/2] tc: flower: enhance mask support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:09:08 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2/net-next 0/2] tc: flower: enhance mask support

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:54:35 +0100
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> this short series enhances mask support for tc flower by:
> * Documenting existing mask support for *_ip parameters
> * Allowing *_mac options to accept a mask.
>   This makes use of existing kernel features.
> 
> Based on net-next +
> "[PATCH iproute2 0/2] Add dest UDP port to IP tunnel parameters"
> 
> Simon Horman (2):
>   tc: flower: document that *_ip parameters take a PREFIX as an
>     argument.
>   tc: flower: Allow *_mac options to accept a mask
> 
>  man/man8/tc-flower.8 | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  tc/f_flower.c        | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, applied to net-next.
Initially applied to wrong tree then reapplied to right tree.