[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR07MB2842EC647393430BE559D5B78D960@DM5PR07MB2842.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:04:27 +0000
From: "Koteshwar Rao, Satha" <Satha.Rao@...ium.com>
To: Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Goutham, Sunil" <Sunil.Goutham@...ium.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Daney, David" <David.Daney@...ium.com>,
"Vatsavayi, Raghu" <Raghu.Vatsavayi@...ium.com>,
"Chickles, Derek" <Derek.Chickles@...ium.com>,
"Romanov, Philip" <Philip.Romanov@...ium.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/7] ThunderX Embedded switch support
Hi Sunil,
In RFC cover letter we explained the feature details, files organized based on their supporting functionality, let me know if you are interested in any specific details
Thanks,
Satha
-----Original Message-----
From: Sunil Kovvuri [mailto:sunil.kovvuri@...il.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 4:03 AM
To: Koteshwar Rao, Satha
Cc: LKML; Goutham, Sunil; Robert Richter; David S. Miller; Daney, David; Vatsavayi, Raghu; Chickles, Derek; Romanov, Philip; Linux Netdev List; LAKML
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] ThunderX Embedded switch support
It would be easier for anyone to review if you prepare patches based on features rather than based on modifications to files.
Thanks,
Sunil.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists