| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <F95AC9340317A84688A5F0DF0246F3F201521164@szxeml504-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:40:40 +0000
From: maowenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To: tndave <tushar.n.dave@...cle.com>,
"jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
Dingtianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] i40e: enable PCIe relax ordering for SPARC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tndave [mailto:tushar.n.dave@...cle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 6:28 AM
> To: maowenan; jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; weiyongjun (A); Dingtianhong
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] i40e: enable PCIe relax ordering for SPARC
>
>
>
> On 12/26/2016 03:39 AM, maowenan wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
> >> [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org]
> >> On Behalf Of Tushar Dave
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:07 AM
> >> To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> >> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: [RFC PATCH] i40e: enable PCIe relax ordering for SPARC
> >>
> >> Unlike previous generation NIC (e.g. ixgbe) i40e doesn't seem to have
> >> standard CSR where PCIe relaxed ordering can be set. Without PCIe
> >> relax ordering enabled, i40e performance is significantly low on SPARC.
> >>
> > [Mao Wenan]Hi Tushar, you have referred to i40e doesn't seem to have
> > standard CSR to set PCIe relaxed ordering, this CSR like TX&Rx DCA Control
> Register in 82599, right?
> Yes.
> i40e datasheet mentions some CSR that can be used to enable/disable PCIe
> relaxed ordering in device; however I don't see the exact definition of those
> register in datasheet.
> (https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg117219.html).
>
> > Is DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING the same as TX&RX control register in
> 82599?
> No.
> DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING applies to the PCIe root complex of the system.
>
> -Tushar
I understand that the PCIe Root Complex is the Host Bridge in the CPU that
connects the CPU and memory to the PCIe architecture. So this attribute
DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING is only applied on CPU side(the SPARC in you
system), it can't apply on i40e, is it right?
And it is not the same as 82599 DCA control register's relax ordering bits.
-Mao Wenan
> >
> > And to enable relax ordering mode in 82599 for SPARC using below codes:
> > s32 ixgbe_start_hw_gen2(struct ixgbe_hw *hw) {
> > u32 i;
> >
> > /* Clear the rate limiters */
> > for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RTTDQSEL, i);
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_RTTBCNRC, 0);
> > }
> > IXGBE_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_SPARC
> > /* Disable relaxed ordering */
> > for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_tx_queues; i++) {
> > u32 regval;
> >
> > regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i));
> > regval &= ~IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_DESC_WRO_EN;
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_TXCTRL_82599(i), regval);
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < hw->mac.max_rx_queues; i++) {
> > u32 regval;
> >
> > regval = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i));
> > regval &= ~(IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_DATA_WRO_EN |
> > IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL_HEAD_WRO_EN);
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_DCA_RXCTRL(i), regval);
> > }
> > #endif
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> >> This patch sets PCIe relax ordering for SPARC arch by setting dma
> >> attr DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING for every tx and rx DMA map/unmap.
> >> This has shown 10x increase in performance numbers.
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >> iperf TCP test with 10 threads on SPARC S7
> >>
> >> Test 1: Without this patch
> >>
> >> [root@...-snt1-03 net]# iperf -s
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Server listening on TCP port 5001
> >> TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> [ 4] local 16.0.0.7 port 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40926 [
> >> 5] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40934 [ 6] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40930 [ 7] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40928 [ 8] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40922 [ 9] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40932 [ 10] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40920 [ 11] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40924 [ 14] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40982 [ 12] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 40980
> >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 566 MBytes 237 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 5] 0.0-20.0 sec 532 MBytes 223 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 6] 0.0-20.0 sec 537 MBytes 225 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 8] 0.0-20.0 sec 546 MBytes 229 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 11] 0.0-20.0 sec 592 MBytes 248 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 7] 0.0-20.0 sec 539 MBytes 226 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 9] 0.0-20.0 sec 572 MBytes 240 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 10] 0.0-20.0 sec 604 MBytes 253 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 14] 0.0-20.0 sec 567 MBytes 238 Mbits/sec
> >> [ 12] 0.0-20.0 sec 511 MBytes 214 Mbits/sec
> >> [SUM] 0.0-20.0 sec 5.44 GBytes 2.33 Gbits/sec
> >>
> >> Test 2: with this patch:
> >>
> >> [root@...-snt1-03 net]# iperf -s
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Server listening on TCP port 5001
> >> TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> TCP: request_sock_TCP: Possible SYN flooding on port 5001. Sending
> cookies.
> >> Check SNMP counters.
> >> [ 4] local 16.0.0.7 port 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46876 [
> >> 5] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46874 [ 6] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46872 [ 7] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46880 [ 8] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46878 [ 9] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46884 [ 10] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46886 [ 11] local 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46890 [ 12] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46888 [ 13] local
> >> 16.0.0.7 port
> >> 5001 connected with 16.0.0.1 port 46882
> >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.45 GBytes 3.19 Gbits/sec [ 5] 0.0-20.0 sec
> >> 7.48 GBytes 3.21 Gbits/sec [ 7] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.34 GBytes 3.15
> >> Gbits/sec [ 8] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.42 GBytes 3.18 Gbits/sec [ 9]
> >> 0.0-20.0 sec 7.24 GBytes 3.11 Gbits/sec [ 10] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.40
> >> GBytes 3.17 Gbits/sec [ 12] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.49 GBytes 3.21
> >> Gbits/sec [ 6] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.30 GBytes 3.13 Gbits/sec [ 11]
> >> 0.0-20.0 sec 7.44 GBytes 3.19 Gbits/sec [ 13] 0.0-20.0 sec 7.22
> >> GBytes 3.10 Gbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-20.0 sec 73.8 GBytes 31.6
> >> Gbits/sec
> >>
> >> NOTE: In my testing, this patch does _not_ show any harm to i40e
> >> performance numbers on x86.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...cle.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 69
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h |
> >> 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> >> index 6287bf6..800dca7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> >> @@ -551,15 +551,17 @@ static void
> >> i40e_unmap_and_free_tx_resource(struct i40e_ring *ring,
> >> else
> >> dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_buffer->skb);
> >> if (dma_unmap_len(tx_buffer, len))
> >> - dma_unmap_single(ring->dev,
> >> - dma_unmap_addr(tx_buffer, dma),
> >> - dma_unmap_len(tx_buffer, len),
> >> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(ring->dev,
> >> + dma_unmap_addr(tx_buffer, dma),
> >> + dma_unmap_len(tx_buffer, len),
> >> + DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> >> + ring->dma_attrs);
> >> } else if (dma_unmap_len(tx_buffer, len)) {
> >> - dma_unmap_page(ring->dev,
> >> - dma_unmap_addr(tx_buffer, dma),
> >> - dma_unmap_len(tx_buffer, len),
> >> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(ring->dev,
> >> + dma_unmap_addr(tx_buffer, dma),
> >> + dma_unmap_len(tx_buffer, len),
> >> + DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> >> + ring->dma_attrs);
> >> }
> >>
> >> tx_buffer->next_to_watch = NULL;
> >> @@ -662,6 +664,8 @@ static bool i40e_clean_tx_irq(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
> >> struct i40e_tx_buffer *tx_buf;
> >> struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_head;
> >> struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc;
> >> + dma_addr_t addr;
> >> + size_t size;
> >> unsigned int total_bytes = 0, total_packets = 0;
> >> unsigned int budget = vsi->work_limit;
> >>
> >> @@ -696,10 +700,11 @@ static bool i40e_clean_tx_irq(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
> >> napi_consume_skb(tx_buf->skb, napi_budget);
> >>
> >> /* unmap skb header data */
> >> - dma_unmap_single(tx_ring->dev,
> >> - dma_unmap_addr(tx_buf, dma),
> >> - dma_unmap_len(tx_buf, len),
> >> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(tx_ring->dev,
> >> + dma_unmap_addr(tx_buf, dma),
> >> + dma_unmap_len(tx_buf, len),
> >> + DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> >> + tx_ring->dma_attrs);
> >>
> >> /* clear tx_buffer data */
> >> tx_buf->skb = NULL;
> >> @@ -717,12 +722,15 @@ static bool i40e_clean_tx_irq(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,
> >> tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(tx_ring, 0);
> >> }
> >>
> >> + addr = dma_unmap_addr(tx_buf, dma);
> >> + size = dma_unmap_len(tx_buf, len);
> >> /* unmap any remaining paged data */
> >> if (dma_unmap_len(tx_buf, len)) {
> >> - dma_unmap_page(tx_ring->dev,
> >> - dma_unmap_addr(tx_buf, dma),
> >> - dma_unmap_len(tx_buf, len),
> >> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(tx_ring->dev,
> >> + addr,
> >> + size,
> >> + DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> >> + tx_ring->dma_attrs);
> >> dma_unmap_len_set(tx_buf, len, 0);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> @@ -1010,6 +1018,11 @@ int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring
> >> *tx_ring)
> >> */
> >> tx_ring->size += sizeof(u32);
> >> tx_ring->size = ALIGN(tx_ring->size, 4096);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC
> >> + tx_ring->dma_attrs = DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING; #else
> >> + tx_ring->dma_attrs = 0;
> >> +#endif
> >> tx_ring->desc = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, tx_ring->size,
> >> &tx_ring->dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!tx_ring->desc) {
> >> @@ -1053,7 +1066,11 @@ void i40e_clean_rx_ring(struct i40e_ring
> *rx_ring)
> >> if (!rx_bi->page)
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> - dma_unmap_page(dev, rx_bi->dma, PAGE_SIZE,
> >> DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> >> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(dev,
> >> + rx_bi->dma,
> >> + PAGE_SIZE,
> >> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> >> + rx_ring->dma_attrs);
> >> __free_pages(rx_bi->page, 0);
> >>
> >> rx_bi->page = NULL;
> >> @@ -1113,6 +1130,11 @@ int i40e_setup_rx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring
> >> *rx_ring)
> >> /* Round up to nearest 4K */
> >> rx_ring->size = rx_ring->count * sizeof(union i40e_32byte_rx_desc);
> >> rx_ring->size = ALIGN(rx_ring->size, 4096);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC
> >> + rx_ring->dma_attrs = DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING; #else
> >> + rx_ring->dma_attrs = 0;
> >> +#endif
> >> rx_ring->desc = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, rx_ring->size,
> >> &rx_ring->dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>
> >> @@ -1182,7 +1204,8 @@ static bool i40e_alloc_mapped_page(struct
> >> i40e_ring *rx_ring,
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* map page for use */
> >> - dma = dma_map_page(rx_ring->dev, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
> >> DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> >> + dma = dma_map_single_attrs(rx_ring->dev, page_address(page),
> >> PAGE_SIZE,
> >> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE, rx_ring->dma_attrs);
> >>
> >> /* if mapping failed free memory back to system since
> >> * there isn't much point in holding memory we can't use @@
> -1695,8
> >> +1718,11 @@ struct sk_buff *i40e_fetch_rx_buffer(struct i40e_ring
> >> +*rx_ring,
> >> rx_ring->rx_stats.page_reuse_count++;
> >> } else {
> >> /* we are not reusing the buffer so unmap it */
> >> - dma_unmap_page(rx_ring->dev, rx_buffer->dma, PAGE_SIZE,
> >> - DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> >> + dma_unmap_single_attrs(rx_ring->dev,
> >> + rx_buffer->dma,
> >> + PAGE_SIZE,
> >> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> >> + rx_ring->dma_attrs);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* clear contents of buffer_info */ @@ -2737,7 +2763,8 @@ static
> >> inline void i40e_tx_map(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, struct sk_buff
> >> *skb,
> >> first->skb = skb;
> >> first->tx_flags = tx_flags;
> >>
> >> - dma = dma_map_single(tx_ring->dev, skb->data, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> + dma = dma_map_single_attrs(tx_ring->dev, skb->data, size,
> >> + DMA_TO_DEVICE, tx_ring->dma_attrs);
> >>
> >> tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i);
> >> tx_bi = first;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
> >> index 5088405..9a86212 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
> >> @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ struct i40e_ring {
> >>
> >> unsigned int size; /* length of descriptor ring in bytes */
> >> dma_addr_t dma; /* physical address of ring */
> >> + unsigned long dma_attrs; /* DMA attributes */
> >>
> >> struct i40e_vsi *vsi; /* Backreference to associated VSI */
> >> struct i40e_q_vector *q_vector; /* Backreference to associated
> vector
> >> */
> >> --
> >> 1.9.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists