lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-KJDmiFt8c+xpEd=WfAN5A=sB9AGo6hjoUwJg4WQ6=-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Dec 2016 19:02:04 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, dborkman@...earbox.net,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next rfc 0/6] convert tc_verd to integer bitfields

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:21 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 14:13:24 -0500
>
>> The skb tc_verd field takes up two bytes but uses far fewer bits.
>> Convert the remaining use cases to bitfields that fit in existing
>> holes (depending on config options) and potentially save the two
>> bytes in struct sk_buff.
>
> I like the looks of this, for sure :-)

Great, thanks. I sent it as RFC initially, because there were some unresolved
issues with TC_FROM semantics last time around. bpf_redirect has been
merged in the meantime, so I suspect that that has been resolved.

But there is no rush. I will run a few more tests, such as the new mirred
ingress path, and will hold off resubmitting until people now on holiday
have a chance to chime in next week.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ