netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tools: test case for TPACKET_V3/TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170102230242.GC31716@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:02:42 -0500
From:   Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tools: test case for TPACKET_V3/TX_RING
 support

On (01/02/17 17:31), Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> 
> Thanks for adding this.
> 
> walk_v3_tx is almost identical to walk_v1_v2_tx. That function can
> just be extended to add a v3 case where it already multiplexes between
> v1 and v2.

I looked at that, but the sticky point is that v1/v2 sets up the
ring->rd* related variables based on frames (e.g., rd_num is tp_frame_nr)
whereas V3 sets these up based on blocks (e.g, rd_num is  tp_block_nr) 
so this impacts the core sending loop a bit.

I suppose we could change the walk_v2_v2_tx to be something like
	while (total_packets > 0) {
		if (ring->version) {
		    /* V3 send, that takes above difference into account */
		} else {
		    /* existing code */
		}
		/* status_bar_update(), user_ready  update frame_num */
	}

I can change it as above, if you think this would help.

--Sowmini