netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sctp: add rfc6525 section 5.2.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADvbK_d+wukreaSQPqG0O6rBqbiKoSbsGMVM=Df_m54ZetUwpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:43:14 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sctp: add rfc6525 section 5.2.4

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:32 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 21:26:47 +0800
>
>> As only when the result is not performed, initial_tsn variables is
>> uninitialized, peer side would ignore this value, so here is also
>> safe.
>
> It doesn't matter if it is "safe" or not, you must fix all of the
> warnings reported by kbuild before your patches will be considered
> for applying.
will fix it in next post. thanks