netdev - Re: [PATCH net 9/9] virtio-net: XDP support for small buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <586AD79B.2070203@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:43:39 -0800
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 9/9] virtio-net: XDP support for small buffers

On 16-12-23 06:37 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> Commit f600b6905015 ("virtio_net: Add XDP support") leaves the case of
> small receive buffer untouched. This will confuse the user who want to
> set XDP but use small buffers. Other than forbid XDP in small buffer
> mode, let's make it work. XDP then can only work at skb->data since
> virtio-net create skbs during refill, this is sub optimal which could
> be optimized in the future.
> 
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Jason,

I was doing some more testing on this what do you think about doing this
so that free_unused_bufs() handles the buffer free with dev_kfree_skb()
instead of put_page in small receive mode. Seems more correct to me.


diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 783e842..27ff76c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1898,6 +1898,10 @@ static void free_receive_page_frags(struct virtnet_info *vi)

 static bool is_xdp_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
 {
+       /* For small receive mode always use kfree_skb variants */
+       if (!vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
+               return false;
+
        if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
                return false;
        else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)


patch is untested just spotted doing code review.

Thanks,
John