[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170103111447.GA26488@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:14:47 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>
Cc: Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"harini.katakam@...inx.com" <harini.katakam@...inx.com>,
"punnaia@...inx.com" <punnaia@...inx.com>,
"michals@...inx.com" <michals@...inx.com>,
"anirudh@...inx.com" <anirudh@...inx.com>,
"boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com"
<boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"tbultel@...elsurmer.com" <tbultel@...elsurmer.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence
GEM.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:47:56AM +0000, Rafal Ozieblo wrote:
> We could use only descriptor approach but there are many Atmel's cores on the market which support only event registers.
As I said in my other reply in this thread, the Atmel cores cannot
possibly be made to work correctly.
Sad, but true.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists