lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170103.095419.261470619535526723.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:54:19 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     wr0112358@...il.com
Cc:     nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop_monitor: consider inserted data in genlmsg_end

From: Reiter Wolfgang <wr0112358@...il.com>
Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 01:39:10 +0100

> Final nlmsg_len field update must reflect inserted net_dm_drop_point
> data.
> 
> This patch depends on previous patch:
> "drop_monitor: add missing call to genlmsg_end"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Reiter Wolfgang <wr0112358@...il.com>

I don't understand why the current code doesn't work properly.

All over the tree, the pattern is:

	x = genlmsg_put(skb, ...);
	...
	genlmsg_end(skb, x);

And that is exactly what the code is doing right now.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ