[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170103.095419.261470619535526723.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:54:19 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wr0112358@...il.com
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop_monitor: consider inserted data in genlmsg_end
From: Reiter Wolfgang <wr0112358@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 01:39:10 +0100
> Final nlmsg_len field update must reflect inserted net_dm_drop_point
> data.
>
> This patch depends on previous patch:
> "drop_monitor: add missing call to genlmsg_end"
>
> Signed-off-by: Reiter Wolfgang <wr0112358@...il.com>
I don't understand why the current code doesn't work properly.
All over the tree, the pattern is:
x = genlmsg_put(skb, ...);
...
genlmsg_end(skb, x);
And that is exactly what the code is doing right now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists