lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170104213024.sghqhqfbzqfl4z47@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:30:24 +0100
From:   Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] Prepare BPF for VLAN_TAG_PRESENT cleanup

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:11:57PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 02:18 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > Those patches prepare BPF ant its JITs for removal of VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.
> > The set depends on "Preparation for VLAN_TAG_PRESENT cleanup" patchset.
> > 
> > The series is supposed to be bisect-friendly and that requires temporary
> > insertion of #define VLAN_TAG_PRESENT in BPF code to be able to split
> > JIT changes per architecture.
> > 
> > Michał Mirosław (6):
> >    net/skbuff: add macros for VLAN_PRESENT bit
> >    net/bpf_jit: ARM: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling from VLAN_TCI
> >    net/bpf_jit: MIPS: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling from VLAN_TCI
> >    net/bpf_jit: PPC: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling from VLAN_TCI
> >    net/bpf_jit: SPARC: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling from VLAN_TCI
> >    net/bpf: split VLAN_PRESENT bit handling from VLAN_TCI
> 
> Please add a proper changelog to all the individual patches, right now
> they have none. Also, how was this runtime tested? Did you run BPF selftest
> suite with them? Seems like they weren't even compile tested properly
> given the kbuild bot barking on sparc ...

Compile bot is barking because it doesn't have patches, which this set depends on.
Sorry about that.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ