[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3be167c0-b7cb-1ab4-6afe-e2e84a3404f5@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:26:29 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, willemb@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] tools: psock_lib: tighten conditions
checked in sock_setfilter
On 01/04/2017 03:55 PM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (01/04/17 15:37), Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> + /* the filter below checks for all of the following conditions that
>>> + * are based on the contents of create_payload()
>>> + * ether type 0x800 and
>>> + * ip proto udp and
>>> + * ip len == ip_len and
>>> + * udp[38] == 'a' or udp[38] == 'b'
>>> + */
>>
>> Looks like you have to do v4 anyway, please make sure your comment
>> block is one of the acceptable formats based on coding style:
>>
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=146799837129319&w=2
>
> BTW, the above is conformant with the comment style required for
> networking:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
>
> which seems to be used in psock_fanout.c and reuseport_bpf.c as well.
I would like to see the comment blocks in selftest consistent with the
Kernel coding style.
>
> Thanks
> --Sowmini
>
Could you please split this patch into two. Hardening part in one and
the cleanup in a separate patch. This way I can get the hardening fix
into 4.10 in my next Kselftest update. Cleanup patch can go in later.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists