[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMiSt2a9rQYpjtu=o8YBA2YjPD=6nSwBnh5gfuseQwXCcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:08:54 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Sridhar Samudrala
<sridhar.samudrala@...el.com> wrote:
> A host based switching entity like a linux bridge or OVS redirects these frames
> to the right VFs via VFPR netdevs. Any frames sent via VFPR netdevs are sent as
> directed transmits to the corresponding VFs. To enable directed transmit, skb
> metadata dst is used to pass the VF id and the frame is requeued to call the PFs
> transmit routine.
Jakub/John, patch #4 which didn't appear in the list had a long discussion [1]
ending with "lets talk on it @ netdev", did we?
Or.
[1] http://marc.info/?t=147457252900002&r=1&w=2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists