[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105134439.5b31678f@griffin>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:44:39 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] net/sched: act_pedit: Use offset
relative to conventional network headers
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:34:58 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> This is a simple action. It is not fool proof - it prevents the user
> from getting out of packet bounds, but it is the user responsibility to
> provide valid rules.
I think I can live with that. Just wanted to point that out. Especially
with combination with hardware offload (e.g. the hardware should not
hang or reset on that).
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists