[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJpBn1xsj+bdbZT_br=JEGEKfY2p5vM2EC9Prt6Oi8EApBeeTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:33:48 +0000
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 5/6] i40e: Add TX and RX support in switchdev mode.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Sridhar Samudrala
> <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com> wrote:
>> A host based switching entity like a linux bridge or OVS redirects these frames
>> to the right VFs via VFPR netdevs. Any frames sent via VFPR netdevs are sent as
>> directed transmits to the corresponding VFs. To enable directed transmit, skb
>> metadata dst is used to pass the VF id and the frame is requeued to call the PFs
>> transmit routine.
>
> Jakub/John, patch #4 which didn't appear in the list had a long discussion [1]
> ending with "lets talk on it @ netdev", did we?
I spoke to a few people, but nobody had much to say about it back then :(
Noob question: can we somehow "debug" why a patch is not appearing on
a vger list?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists