netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net:dsa: check for EPROBE_DEFER from dsa_dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170105.114012.736194534944916815.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:40:12 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        volodymyr.bendiuga@...termo.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net:dsa: check for EPROBE_DEFER from
 dsa_dst_parse()

From: Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2017 11:10:13 +0100

> Since there can be multiple dsa switches stacked together but
> not all of devicetree nodes available at the time of calling
> dsa_dst_parse(), EPROBE_DEFER can be returned by it. When this
> happens, only the last dsa switch has to be deleted by
> dsa_dst_del_ds(), but not the whole list, because next time linux
> cames back to this function it will try to add only the last dsa
> switch which returned EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

Applied.