lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1483723976.9712.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 06 Jan 2017 09:32:56 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: Fix inconsistent rtnl_lock usage on
 dev_get_stats().

On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 23:21 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
> Some callers take rtnl_lock() before calling dev_get_stats() and some
> don't.  Most network drivers expect the ndo_get_stats64() to be called
> under rtnl_lock() to avoid race conditions with device close or ethtool
> reconfigurations.  Fix it so that all callers take rtnl_lock().
> 
> Rename the original dev_get_stats() as __dev_get_stats() and add a new
> dev_get_stats() that takes rtnl_lock() before calling __dev_get_stats().
> Modify all callers that already take rtnl_lock() to call __dev_get_stats().

This makes no sense to me.

RTNL is absolutely not needed to get device stats.

We try to not add RTNL, especially when not required.

Sure, RTNETLINK dumps currently hold RTNL, but we had various attempts
in the past to get rid of this behavior.

If a device driver expects RTNL being locked, it is clearly a bug that
needs a fix anyway.




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ