lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170106.203804.2023763441703979123.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     phil@....cc
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 0/3] net: dummy: Introduce dummy virtual
 functions

From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2017 20:09:10 +0100

> This series adds VF support to dummy device driver after adding the
> necessary infrastructure changes:
> 
> Patch 1 adds a netdevice callback for device-specific VF count
> retrieval. Patch 2 then changes dev_num_vf() implementation to make use
> of that new callback (if implemented), falling back to the old
> behaviour. Patch 3 then implements VF support in dummy, without the fake
> PCI parent device hack from v5.

Please don't make this a netdev specific method and interface.

Put the method in "struct bus_device", thereby making it a generic
"device" layer thing.

So the pci BUS type will implement pci_bus_type.num_vf().  And you'll
make a bus type for the dummy device to attach to which will implement
it's own.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ