lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170108084624.GA26775@office.localdomain>
Date:   Sun, 8 Jan 2017 10:46:24 +0200
From:   Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
        hadarh@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] net/sched: act_pedit: Use offset
 relative to conventional network headers

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:51:09PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
> Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2017 11:54:51 +0200
> 
> > Enhancing the UAPI to allow for specifying that would allow the same
> > flows to be set into both SW and HW.
> 
> This is actually not backward compatible.
> 
> When pedit rules are dumped, older tools will not know about the
> type field and therefore will completely misinterpret the rule.
> 
> You must extend this the proper way, which is to add a new attribute
> or something along those lines.  The presense of a new attribute
> is an explicit communication to older tools that somethng they
> might not support and understand is going on.

Sorry, I missed this scenario. Going back to the drawing board.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ