netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] liquidio: store the L4 hash of rx packets in skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170108.170941.1437038681712014840.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 08 Jan 2017 17:09:41 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     felix.manlunas@...ium.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, raghu.vatsavayi@...ium.com,
        derek.chickles@...ium.com, satananda.burla@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] liquidio: store the L4 hash of rx packets in
 skb

From: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:55:42 -0800

>  
> +		if (rh->r_dh.has_hash) {
> +			u32 hash = be32_to_cpu(*(u32 *)(skb->data + r_dh_off));

Is the checksum defined to be in the first 4-bytes of the 8-byte DHLEN unit,
or the second 4-bytes?  Is the answer to this question endian-dependent?