netdev - Re: [for-next V2 06/10] net/mlx5: Add interface to get reference to a UAR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 18:05:16 +0200
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
        Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next V2 06/10] net/mlx5: Add interface to get reference to a UAR

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:47 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 10:31:36 +0200
>
>> We will submit an incremental patch for this, as checkpatch doesn't
>> complain about such minor things.
>
> Please fix this and resubmit the series.
>

Sure, will do this.

> Checkpatch not complaining is not an argument for fixing up coding
> style issues reported to you in feedback.

I just thought that this pull request is sitting in the mailing list
for too long and we need to move on.
Such minor issues can be fixed in incremental patches that doesn't
block net-next and rdma submissions.

Anyway will fix and submit v3.

thanks,
Saeed.