[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7994849c-5231-c0ee-e9e7-0c21c570f859@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:29:28 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, andrew@...n.ch,
jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: switchdev: Add
switchdev_port_bridge_getlink_deferred
On 01/09/2017 12:28 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:13:19PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 01/09/2017 12:11 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:45:02AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> Add switchdev_port_bridge_getlink_deferred() which does a deferred
>>>> object dump operation, this is required for e.g: DSA switches which
>>>> typically have sleeping I/O operations which is incompatible with being
>>>> in atomic context obviously.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>
>>>> struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>>>> .orig_dev = dev,
>>>> @@ -829,12 +841,49 @@ int switchdev_port_bridge_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
>>>> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>>>> return err;
>>>>
>>>> - return ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(skb, pid, seq, dev, mode,
>>>> + return ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(skb, pid, seq, d, mode,
>>>
>>> Was this s/dev/d/ by mistake?
>>
>> No, it's not a mistake, it was made so that the function signature could
>> be within 80 columns.
>
> Right, but the change on the signature is on the chunk prior to this
> one. Yet this one is not on the prototype and leads to:
>
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c: In function ‘__switchdev_port_bridge_getlink’:
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c:844:48: error: ‘d’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> return ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(skb, pid, seq, d, mode,
> ^
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c:844:48: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c:847:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
That's embarrassing, looks like I changed it after the fact to please
checkpatch.pl, that's a mistake. Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists