netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170109215336.7699afd8@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:53:36 +0100
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     eric.dumazet@...il.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large
 struct on stack"

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:52:59 -0500 (EST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> 
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:07:04 -0800
> 
> > You really should come to netdev conferences so that you understand
> > goals and efforts, instead of living in your cave.  
> 
> I completely agree with Eric.
> 
> Cong we have a very serious problem with you exactly because you make
> quite vicious emotional statements targetted at other developers
> merely when they say something you disagree with.
> 
> This is completely unacceptable behavior, and you must stop doing
> this, now.

I agree, and it is even documented in:
 Documentation/process/code-of-conflict.rst

Quote: "As a reviewer of code, please strive to keep things civil and
focused on the technical issues involved. [...]"

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/code-of-conflict.html

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer