netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: switchdev: Avoid sleep in atomic with DSA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:14:36 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: switchdev: Avoid sleep in atomic with
 DSA

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:48PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 12:48 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > Hi Florian,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:44:59AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This patch series is to resolve a sleeping function called in atomic context
> >> debug splat that we observe with DSA.
> >>
> >> Let me know what you think, I was also wondering if we should just always
> >> make switchdev_port_vlan_fill() set SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER, but was afraid this
> >> could cause invalid contexts to be used for rocker, mlxsw, i40e etc.
> > 
> > Isn't this a bit of overkill? All the drivers you mention fill the VLAN
> > dump from their cache and don't require sleeping. Even b53 that you
> > mention in the last patch does that, but reads the PVID from the device,
> > which entails taking a mutex.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > 
> > Can't you just cache the PVID as well? I think this will solve your
> > problem. Didn't look too much into the b53 code, so maybe I'm missing
> > something. Seems that mv88e6xxx has a similar problem.
> 
> I suppose we could indeed cache the PVID for b53, but for mv88e6xxx it
> seems like we need to perform a bunch of VTU operations, and those
> access HW registers, Andrew, Vivien, how do you want to solve that, do
> we want to introduce a general VLAN cache somewhere in switchdev/DSA/driver?

Truth be told, I don't quite understand why switchdev infra even tries
to dump the VLANs from the device. Like, in which situations is this
going to be different from what the software bridge reports? Sure, you
can set the VLAN filters with SELF and skip the software bridge, but how
does that make sense in a model where you want to reflect the software
datapath?