netdev - Re: pull-request: mac80211 2017-01-06

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1483960659.17582.29.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Mon, 09 Jan 2017 12:17:39 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: mac80211 2017-01-06

On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:37:20 +0100
> 
> > Here's another fix for something I noticed while reviewing the code
> in
> > a new suggested patch that added another netlink socket destroy
> path.
> > 
> > Since the new patch would otherwise cause conflicts, it might be
> good
> > to pull net or Linus's next RC containing it into net-next, if you
> can.
> > 
> > Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.
> 
> Pulled,

Thanks :)

> I'll try to get this moving into net-next over the weekend.

> Remind me about this early next week if that ends up slipping through
> the cracks.

Actually, I just got the new version of the other patch and it turns
out that it's not necessary since the context for that new bit is small
enough to not have included the difference - so since you haven't done
that yet, no need to bother, sorry I didn't realize that earlier.

johannes