lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60d188ef-a080-1707-9ff2-0ebfa58b81d2@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:58:53 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: Implement ndo_get_phys_port_name()

On 01/10/2017 12:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:32:36PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Return the physical port number of a DSA created network device using
>> ndo_get_phys_port_name().
> 
> At what level does this need to be unique?

This needs to be unique to the switch I would say,
ndo_get_phys_switch_id would return the physical number of the switch
device in the tree/cluster, so that number plus the port name should be
an unique differentiator that is good enough for e.g: a persistent
naming rule?

> 
> We can have multiple switches within one switch cluster. p->port will
> be unique within one switch, but can be repeated in a cluster.
> 
> We can also have multiple clusters, and again p->port will be re-used.


-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ