netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: dsa: Add support for platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170110212117.GO22820@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 22:21:17 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@...il.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
        Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Marvell Dove/MV78xx0/Orion SOC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: dsa: Add support for platform data

> Last time we discussed this, I had a super complex dsa2_platform_data
> that allowed you to do exactly the same thing we currently do with
> Device Tree, except that this was with platform_data. It took a lot of
> effort to get there, but I essentially had the ZII vf160 board example
> re-implemented and verified with a mockup driver (still have it in a
> branch that's not too far from net-next/master).

One thing different this time is you have associated the platform data
to an MDIO device. So the platform data represents one switch, not the
whole complex. This is going to make the platform data much simpler,
and allow the core to do the work of assembling the multiple platform
datas into one switch complex. So basically, the platform data is
dsa_chip_data.

To handle multi-CPUs, we need to move the master ethernet device and
put it next to the cpu port. So add a

struct device   *netdev[DSA_MAX_PORTS];

to dsa_chip_data. It then becomes easy to represent multiple CPU
ports.

> I would very much like to see the patches and then make a decision based
> on the submission rather than project a decision on code that has not
> been submitted yet.

The first version was posted a week ago. I requested a lot of
changes. So lets see what John says about when the next version will
be ready.

   Andrew