netdev - [PATCH v2 4/8] bpf: Use SHA256 instead of SHA1 for bpf digests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d6560ca273fe76969a7d9b31c5465ef614835f5d.1484090585.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:24:42 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] bpf: Use SHA256 instead of SHA1 for bpf digests

SHA1 is considered obsolete.  It is no longer considered to be
collision resistant and, in general, it should not be used for new
applications.  Change the new-in-4.10 BPF digest to SHA-256.  This
means that potential future applications of the digest that need
collision resistance will be able to use the BPF digest.  Applications
that just want a short identifier for a BPF program are welcome to
truncate the digest.

This is also a cleanup IMO -- the new sha256_*_direct() API is much
nicer than the old SHA1 library helpers.  It will also enable
incremental hashing so the BPF code can avoid calling vmalloc().

I moved the digest field to keep all of the bpf program metadata in
the same cache line.

Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/filter.h | 11 +++--------
 init/Kconfig           |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/core.c      | 42 ++++++++----------------------------------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 702314253797..23df2574e30c 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/capability.h>
-#include <linux/cryptohash.h>
+
+#include <crypto/sha.h>
 
 #include <net/sch_generic.h>
 
@@ -408,11 +409,11 @@ struct bpf_prog {
 	kmemcheck_bitfield_end(meta);
 	enum bpf_prog_type	type;		/* Type of BPF program */
 	u32			len;		/* Number of filter blocks */
-	u32			digest[SHA_DIGEST_WORDS]; /* Program digest */
 	struct bpf_prog_aux	*aux;		/* Auxiliary fields */
 	struct sock_fprog_kern	*orig_prog;	/* Original BPF program */
 	unsigned int		(*bpf_func)(const void *ctx,
 					    const struct bpf_insn *insn);
+	u8			digest[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; /* Program digest */
 	/* Instructions for interpreter */
 	union {
 		struct sock_filter	insns[0];
@@ -519,12 +520,6 @@ static inline u32 bpf_prog_insn_size(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	return prog->len * sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
 }
 
-static inline u32 bpf_prog_digest_scratch_size(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	return round_up(bpf_prog_insn_size(prog) +
-			sizeof(__be64) + 1, SHA_MESSAGE_BYTES);
-}
-
 static inline unsigned int bpf_prog_size(unsigned int proglen)
 {
 	return max(sizeof(struct bpf_prog),
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 223b734abccd..f1ea6d023f8c 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1389,6 +1389,7 @@ config HAVE_PCSPKR_PLATFORM
 # interpreter that classic socket filters depend on
 config BPF
 	bool
+	select CRYPTO_SHA256_DIRECT
 
 menuconfig EXPERT
 	bool "Configure standard kernel features (expert users)"
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 1eb4f1303756..668b92f6ab58 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -148,22 +148,18 @@ void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 
 int bpf_prog_calc_digest(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 {
-	const u32 bits_offset = SHA_MESSAGE_BYTES - sizeof(__be64);
-	u32 raw_size = bpf_prog_digest_scratch_size(fp);
-	u32 ws[SHA_WORKSPACE_WORDS];
-	u32 i, bsize, psize, blocks;
+	struct sha256_state sha;
+	u32 i, psize;
 	struct bpf_insn *dst;
 	bool was_ld_map;
-	u8 *raw, *todo;
-	__be32 *result;
-	__be64 *bits;
+	u8 *raw;
 
-	raw = vmalloc(raw_size);
+	psize = bpf_prog_insn_size(fp);
+	raw = vmalloc(psize);
 	if (!raw)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	sha_init(fp->digest);
-	memset(ws, 0, sizeof(ws));
+	sha256_init_direct(&sha);
 
 	/* We need to take out the map fd for the digest calculation
 	 * since they are unstable from user space side.
@@ -188,30 +184,8 @@ int bpf_prog_calc_digest(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 		}
 	}
 
-	psize = bpf_prog_insn_size(fp);
-	memset(&raw[psize], 0, raw_size - psize);
-	raw[psize++] = 0x80;
-
-	bsize  = round_up(psize, SHA_MESSAGE_BYTES);
-	blocks = bsize / SHA_MESSAGE_BYTES;
-	todo   = raw;
-	if (bsize - psize >= sizeof(__be64)) {
-		bits = (__be64 *)(todo + bsize - sizeof(__be64));
-	} else {
-		bits = (__be64 *)(todo + bsize + bits_offset);
-		blocks++;
-	}
-	*bits = cpu_to_be64((psize - 1) << 3);
-
-	while (blocks--) {
-		sha_transform(fp->digest, todo, ws);
-		todo += SHA_MESSAGE_BYTES;
-	}
-
-	result = (__force __be32 *)fp->digest;
-	for (i = 0; i < SHA_DIGEST_WORDS; i++)
-		result[i] = cpu_to_be32(fp->digest[i]);
-
+	sha256_update_direct(&sha, raw, psize);
+	sha256_final_direct(&sha, fp->digest);
 	vfree(raw);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.9.3