lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:04:36 -0700 From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com> Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>, temnota.am@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: put autoconf routes into per-interface tables On 1/9/17 7:29 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote: >> That's news to me. What about IPv6 and VRF is not working or well-supported? > > I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems > that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would > indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept > DAD is a pretty serious issue. Andrey, what version of the kernel did > you see this on? > Are you referencing an Android or google thread? This patch thread has not mentioned any IPv6 problems. Just a day or so ago I did a dup address test on an interface in a vrf and it worked fine, but perhaps I missed something.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists