[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109223441.4cbca16a@xeon-e3>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:34:41 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Alexander Loktionov <Alexander.Loktionov@...antia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David VomLehn <vomlehn@...as.net>,
Simon Edelhaus <Simon.Edelhaus@...antia.com>,
Dmitrii Tarakanov <Dmitrii.Tarakanov@...antia.com>,
Pavel Belous <Pavel.Belous@...antia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] net: ethernet: aquantia: Add ring support code
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:16:01 -0800
Alexander Loktionov <Alexander.Loktionov@...antia.com> wrote:
> ++self->stats.rx_packets;
> + ++ndev->stats.rx_packets;
> + ndev->stats.rx_bytes += buff->len;
Why keep two sets of statistics (self->stats and ndev->stats); seems redundant.
Could also use per-cpu network stats pcpu_sw_netstats
You could also optimize by doing only one addition of ndev->stats after processing
several packets.
> + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, ETH_HLEN);
> + skb_put(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> + memcpy(skb->data, page_address(buff->page), ETH_HLEN);
Why not use build_skb() here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists