netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: put autoconf routes into per-interface tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <un3fkd-lod.ln1@banana.localnet>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:21:36 +0300
From:   "Andrey Jr. Melnikov" <temnota.am@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: put autoconf routes into per-interface tables

David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> On 1/9/17 8:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> >>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems
> >>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would
> >>> indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept
> >>> DAD is a pretty serious issue. Andrey, what version of the kernel did
> >>> you see this on?
> >>
> >> Are you referencing an Android or google thread? This patch thread has not mentioned any IPv6 problems.
> > 
> > No, this thread. I see message-ID 8cddkd-etc.ln1@...ana.localnet in
> > this thread. If you didn't get it, I also see it in the comments on
> > patchwork - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/711956/
> > 

> Odd that I did not get that -- checked spam and trash.

> Andrey is missing 830218c1add1da16519b71909e5cf21522b7d062 which tells me the comment is not based on 4.10 or net-next:

> $ git describe 830218c1add1da16519b71909e5cf21522b7d062
> v4.8-14744-g830218c1add1

Good catch. I'm running 4.8 without this patch. Current 4.10-rc works. Sorry
for noise.