[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170111.092734.1181805618953056278.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:27:34 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
jiri@...nulli.us, uwe@...ine-koenig.org, andrew.smirnov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dsa: make "label" property optional
for dsa2
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 18:13:51 -0500
> In the new DTS bindings for DSA (dsa2), the "ethernet" and "link"
> phandles are respectively mandatory and exclusive to CPU port and DSA
> link device tree nodes.
>
> Simplify dsa2.c a bit by checking the presence of such phandle instead
> of checking the redundant "label" property.
>
> Then the Linux philosophy for Ethernet switch ports is to expose them to
> userspace as standard NICs by default. Thus use the standard enumerated
> "eth%d" device name if no "label" property is provided for a user port.
> This allows to save DTS files from subjective net device names.
>
> If one wants to rename an interface, udev rules can be used as usual.
>
> Of course the current behavior is unchanged, and the optional "label"
> property for user ports has precedence over the enumerated name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists