[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484167422.15816.1.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:43:42 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Cc: "Jonathan T. Leighton" <jtleight@...l.edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: TCP using IPv4-mapped IPv6 address as source
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 14:59 -0500, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> I think the RFC states somewhere that you should never ever
> send out a v4 mapped address on the wire.
Can you point the exact RFC ?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2765 seems to allow just that.
Jonathan issue is about terminating such flows in TCP stack, which is
likely not needed/useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists