[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170110.204034.925090776724245879.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:40:34 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dsa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: ipv4: return route match in GETROUTE
request
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:32:50 -0800
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index 8c93ad1ef9ab..471384b72cea 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ enum rtattr_type_t {
> RTA_EXPIRES,
> RTA_PAD,
> RTA_UID,
> + RTA_ROUTE_GET, /* nested attribute; route spec for RTM_GETROUTE */
> + RTA_ROUTE_GET_RTM, /* struct rtmsg for nested spec */
> __RTA_MAX
> };
The nested attribute and the attributes within that nested attribute
live in two different attribute number namespaces.
So usually we allocate the nested attribute at the top level in the
main enumeration. Then the elements within the nested attribute
get allocated with a new enumeration created specifically for items
inside that nested attribute.
For example, RTA_METRICS --> RTAX_*
So please arrange things this way.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists