netdev - [PATCH net-next] lwt_bpf: bpf_lwt_prog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170112143928.21496-1-weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:39:28 +0000
From:   Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] lwt_bpf: bpf_lwt_prog_cmp() can be static

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>

Fixes the following sparse warning:

net/core/lwt_bpf.c:355:5: warning:
 symbol 'bpf_lwt_prog_cmp' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
---
 net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
index 71bb3e2..40ef8ae 100644
--- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
+++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int bpf_encap_nlsize(struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate)
 	       0;
 }
 
-int bpf_lwt_prog_cmp(struct bpf_lwt_prog *a, struct bpf_lwt_prog *b)
+static int bpf_lwt_prog_cmp(struct bpf_lwt_prog *a, struct bpf_lwt_prog *b)
 {
 	/* FIXME:
 	 * The LWT state is currently rebuilt for delete requests which