[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170112113449.581e2219@xeon-e3>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:34:49 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH] tc: m_xt: Fix segfault with iptables-1.6.0
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:22:49 +0100
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> Said iptables version introduced struct xtables_globals field
> 'compat_rev', a function pointer. Initializing it is mandatory as
> libxtables calls it without existence check.
>
> Without this, tc segfaults when using the xt action like so:
>
> | tc filter add dev d0 parent ffff: u32 match u32 0 0 \
> | action xt -j MARK --set-mark 20
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> ---
> tc/m_xt.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tc/m_xt.c b/tc/m_xt.c
> index dbb54981462ee..57ed40d7aa3a8 100644
> --- a/tc/m_xt.c
> +++ b/tc/m_xt.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ static struct xtables_globals tcipt_globals = {
> .orig_opts = original_opts,
> .opts = original_opts,
> .exit_err = NULL,
> +#if (XTABLES_VERSION_CODE >= 11)
> + .compat_rev = xtables_compatible_revision,
> +#endif
> };
>
> /*
Ah the xtables API is not really an application friendly API by
any stretch of the imagination
Parenthesis not really necessary there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists