netdev - Re: [PATCH] flow disector: check if arp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1484331851.13165.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:24:11 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
        Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flow disector: check if arp_eth is null rather than arp

On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 13:34 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> arp is being checked instead of arp_eth to see if the call to
> __skb_header_pointer failed. Fix this by checking arp_eth is
> null instead of arp.
> 
> CoverityScan CID#1396428 ("Logically dead code") on 2nd
> arp comparison (which should be arp_eth instead).
> 
> Fixes: commit 55733350e5e8b70c5 ("flow disector: ARP support")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  net/core/flow_dissector.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> index e3dffc7..fec48e9 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>  					       sizeof(_arp_eth), data,
>  					       hlen - sizeof(_arp),
>  					       &_arp_eth);
> -		if (!arp)
> +		if (!arp_eth)
>  			goto out_bad;
>  
>  		if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,

It looks that we try very hard to add critical bugs in flow dissector.

This is embarrassing really.

I am questioning if the __skb_header_pointer() is correct

Why using hlen - sizeof(_arp) ?

               arp_eth = __skb_header_pointer(skb, nhoff + sizeof(_arp),
                                              sizeof(_arp_eth), data,
                                              hlen - sizeof(_arp),
                                              &_arp_eth);