netdev - Re: [PATCH] synopsys: remove dwc_eth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47eecb42-f685-7db7-f265-7c22ddf73cfd@axis.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:26:59 +0100
From:   Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
To:     Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <larper@...s.com>, <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        <alexandre.torgue@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] synopsys: remove dwc_eth_qos driver

On 01/12/2017 04:54 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:
> Às 3:48 PM de 1/12/2017, David Miller escreveu:
>> From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:46:31 +0000
>>
>>> Hope we can meet in a LinuxCon soon and have a talk, for you to know
>>> me and this way you will see that I am a guy that is only focused in
>>> producing work the best way possible, and nothing else.
>> I do not argue your intentions.
>>
>> I argue the side effects of your change for the ecosystem of
>> long term maintaince and backporting, and what tangible benefit
>> this change brings to users.
>>
> The driver synopsys/dwc_eth_qos is no longer necessary since it was ported to
> stmmac. The merged followed all the requirements given by AXIS coleagues Niklas
> and Lars. The new stmmac solution was tested by them. In my opinion of course
> there is no reason to synopsys/dwc_eth_qos to exist anymore. I am deleting now a
> synopsys/ name folder :) I did this work to improve organization and centralize
> dwc ethernet in stmmac.

Hello Joao, David.

Regardless of the outcome of the "to rename or not to rename"
discussion, I think that merging this patch would be a good thing.

Joao's dwc_eth_qos glue layer has been merged to stmmac,
so it should now be safe to remove the dwc_eth_qos driver.

It's much better if everyone is focusing on a single driver.

>
> I know that changing what is working properly is a risk, I totally understand,
> and if I was a top maintainer I would have the same concern of course. But in
> this case I think it is good to organize the house. My intentions are to stick
> around and help developing Ethernet, like I am helping developing PCI host/.
>
> Thanks,
> Joao