netdev - RE: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A2BAEFC30C8FD34388F02C9B3121859D225F44DE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:35:08 +0000
From:   Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com>,
        Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
        "maloy@...jonn.com" <maloy@...jonn.com>,
        "tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link



> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of David Miller
> Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2017 14:45
> To: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; viro@...iv.linux.org.uk; Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
> <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com>; Ying Xue
> <ying.xue@...driver.com>; maloy@...jonn.com; tipc-
> discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link
> 
> From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
> Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:26:45 -0500
> 
> > We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link
> > encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the
> > interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more
> > consistent.
> 
> This doesn't apply to net-next, also the Date in your emails is 10 days
> in the past.  What's going on here?

I don't know. This series was sent in on Jan 3rd, and applied by you the same day. Maybe the mail server decided to send you a duplicate?

///jon