[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170116083320.GB32481@mtr-leonro.local>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:33:20 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@...adcom.com>,
Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for bnxt_re V3 03/21] bnxt_re: register with the NIC
driver
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:38:40PM +0530, Selvin Xavier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Recently, in one of our submission to netdev and rdma, we got
> > a reminder that inline functions shouldn't be in *.c. Let for
> > the compiler to decide.
> >
> > IMHO, it should be open-coded without wrappers and honestly I failed to
> > understand why do you need so many wrappers for one line standard kernel
> > functions.
>
> Agreed. During the initial days of development, we had some debug code also
> inside these wrapper functions. Since the debug code was removed before upstream
> submission, this function ended up as a wrapper for standard kernel function.
> It makes perfect sense to knock off these wrapper functions. I will
> queue it for next
> clean-up/bug fix patch series.
I'm fine with it as long as it's done.
>
> Thanks
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists