netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] qed: Replace memset with eth_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:54:35 +0530
From:   Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com, Ariel.Elior@...ium.com,
        everest-linux-l2@...ium.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:38:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Please do not ever submit two patches which have the same exact commit
> header line, as these two patches do.
> 
> When someone looks into the shortlog of GIT history all they will see
> is "qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr" twice.
> 
> This gives the reader no idea what might be different between those
> two changes.
> 
> Therefore you must give unique a commit header text for each change,
> which communicates sufficiently what is different in each change.

Thanks a lot for correcting me. I'll take care of this thing.

I'm resending these two patches as 
	1). qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr
	2). qed: Use eth_zero_addr
	
I hope it resolves same commit header line conflict.

Regards,
Shyam