netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] qed: Replace memset with eth_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170116.121203.1376051612147199138.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:12:03 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Cc:     mayhs11saini@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr

From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:05:05 +0000

> Other than the fact these 2 patches change 2 different qed files,

That's what I was trying to hint at, the locations within the drivers
were the unique element.

> is there any significant difference between what each does?
> If not, why not simply do both in a single patch?

Also agreed.