[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170117084412.0bff48bb@xeon-e3>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:44:12 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Alexander Heinlein <alexander.heinlein@...unet.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip/xfrm: Fix deleteall when having many policies
installed
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:09:01 +0100
Alexander Heinlein <alexander.heinlein@...unet.com> wrote:
> Fix "Policy buffer overflow" error when trying to use deleteall with
> many policies installed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Heinlein <alexander.heinlein@...unet.com>
> ---
> ip/xfrm_policy.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ip/xfrm_policy.c b/ip/xfrm_policy.c
> index cc9c0f1..451b982 100644
> --- a/ip/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/ip/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -732,10 +732,8 @@ static int xfrm_policy_keep(const struct
> sockaddr_nl *who,
> if (!xfrm_policy_filter_match(xpinfo, ptype))
> return 0;
>
> - if (xb->offset > xb->size) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "Policy buffer overflow\n");
> - return -1;
> - }
> + if (xb->offset + NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*xpid)) > xb->size)
> + return 0;
>
> new_n = (struct nlmsghdr *)(xb->buf + xb->offset);
> new_n->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*xpid));
What happens when many many policies are installed?
It looks like your patch would silently stop deleting.
Does the the code flush all of them?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists