lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:34:40 -0800 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com Subject: Re: fq_codel and skb->hash On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 17:44 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 17:04 -0700, Andrew Collins wrote: > > Is there a better way to manage flow separation in routed+encapsulated traffic? > > Encapsulated traffic is fine, since flow dissector skips encap header(s) > up to the L4 header. > > Problem is about encrypted traffic, since presumably this L4 header is > opaque for flow dissector ;) BTW, how can we make sure skb->hash is populated before IPSEC ? Relying on forwarding, and skb->hash set by a device might be not enough.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists