lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:03:05 +0530 From: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com, Ariel.Elior@...ium.com, everest-linux-l2@...ium.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:58:19PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com> > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:21:38 +0530 > > > Use eth_zero_addr to assign zero address to the given address array > > instead of memset when the second argument in memset is address > > of zero. Also, it makes the code clearer > > > > Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com> > > This patch does not apply cleanly to the net-next tree. I always send patches from linux-next tree and that caused this mistake I apologize for this. > Please state if you don't understand what that means instead of > submitting this patch over and over again against the wrong source > tree. Now sent from net-next tree Thanks a lot, Shyam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists