[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170117.140552.539738967862859087.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:05:52 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: EladN@...at.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.6.7-rt14 kernel workqueue lockup - rtnl deadlock plus
syscall endless loop
From: Elad Nachman <EladN@...at.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:15:19 +0000
> Any thought about limiting the amount of busy polling? Say if more
> than X polls are done within a jiffy, then at least for preemptable
> kernels you can sleep for a jiffy inside the syscall to yield the
> CPU for a while?
We cannot yield there, because we must return immediately from this
context in order to drop the sysctl locks and references.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists