[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cad896d-8ea3-64c7-9137-55609bd38e35@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:03:34 +0100
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next 0/5] add latest bridge netlink options
On 17/01/17 10:32, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Add the bridge netlink attributes added to kernel recently.
>
> Hangbin Liu (5):
> iplink: bridge: add support for IFLA_BR_FDB_FLUSH
> iplink: bridge: add support for IFLA_BR_VLAN_STATS_ENABLED
> iplink: bridge: add support for IFLA_BR_MCAST_STATS_ENABLED
> iplink: bridge: add support for IFLA_BR_MCAST_IGMP_VERSION
> iplink: bridge: add support for IFLA_BR_MCAST_MLD_VERSION
>
> ip/iplink_bridge.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Cool, I also have a version of all of these patches just didn't get around to send them yet. :-)
Anyway since you're at it, you should also add support for IFLA_BRPORT_FLUSH,
but TBH I don't think the flush attributes should be used via this command, they seem
like an action that you do rather than an option that you set. That is the reason I
didn't add support for them awhile back when I added the others. But I don't have a
strong feeling about doing it via ip link set or not, so if the others are fine, I'm good too.
Cheers,
Nik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists