netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net sched: Trivial whitespace and stylistic changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:12:31 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        paulb@...lanox.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, mrv@...atatu.com, hadarh@...lanox.com,
        ogerlitz@...lanox.com, roid@...lanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net sched: Trivial whitespace and
 stylistic changes

Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:11:49PM CET, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
>Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>---

[...]
	
>-static inline unsigned long
>-cls_set_class(struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long *clp, 
>+static inline unsigned long cls_set_class(struct tcf_proto *tp,
>+					  unsigned long *clp,
> 	unsigned long cl)

While you are at it, you can align this as well.


> {
> 	unsigned long old_cl;
>-	

This empty line should definitelly stay.


> 	tcf_tree_lock(tp);
> 	old_cl = __cls_set_class(clp, cl);
> 	tcf_tree_unlock(tp);
>- 
> 	return old_cl;
> }
> 

[...]

>@@ -237,7 +232,6 @@ static inline int tcf_em_early_end(struct tcf_ematch *em, int result)
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
>-	

This empty line should stay.


> /**
>  * struct tcf_ematch_tree - ematch tree handle
>  *
>@@ -246,8 +240,7 @@ static inline int tcf_em_early_end(struct tcf_ematch *em, int result)
>  */
> struct tcf_ematch_tree {
> 	struct tcf_ematch_tree_hdr hdr;
>-	struct tcf_ematch *	matches;
>-	
>+	struct tcf_ematch	*matches;

Well, to be pedantic, this still looks odd :)


> };