netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] drivers: base: Add device_find_in_class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve9xn6wDxFwnkPDyY8yVwVysK3-pUsoxv3GfVbbEVZoBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 02:00:25 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Marvell Dove/MV78xx0/Orion SOC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] drivers: base: Add device_find_in_class_name()

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> On 01/17/2017 03:34 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:

>>> +static int device_class_name_match(struct device *dev, void *class)
>>
>> And why not const char *class?
>
> This was raised back in v2, and the same response applies:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg147559.html
>
> Changing the signature of a callback is out of the scope of this patch
> series.

Ah, right.

But why not to use void *class_name to be consistent with callback and
device_find_child()?

Btw,

return get_device(parent);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko